A Loveland, CO–based investigation into homeless shelters, dark money, and the council.
Terms on this page

Site-by-site retrieval matrix

SiteWorking methodFailure mode otherwise
cilovelandco.civicweb.netVPN + plain curl
reflect-cityofloveland-co.cablecast.tvVPN + plain curl
loveland.legistar.comn/a — empty tenant“Invalid parameters!”; Loveland does not use Legistar
projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/api/v2/VPN + plain curl
projects.propublica.org/nonprofits/download-filing(blocked)Cloudflare security check on PDF downloads
www.lovgov.orgVPN + curl_cffi popular browser UAAkamai 403 on plain curl
www.larimer.govVPN + curl_cffi popular browser UABot manager requires browser TLS fingerprint
maps1.larimer.org/arcgisVPN + curl_cffi
apps.larimer.org/api/assessor2/VPN + curl_cffi
records.larimer.org/landmarkwebVPN + curl_cffi, requires registered account for image fetchplaceholder PNG returned otherwise
apps.dfi.wi.govVPN + curl_cffi + ASP.NET form scrape (viewstate)
coloradosos.gov/bizVPN + curl_cffi + Struts form POST
www.loopnet.com(blocked)Full Akamai Bot Manager JS challenge — needs headless browser
www.realtor.com(rate-limited)429 from VPN exit; would need residential proxy

API endpoints discovered

These are the non-obvious endpoints that produced most of the leverage:

Tools used

Reproducibility check

Any reader with similar tooling and a free Larimer Landmark Web registered account can re-derive every documented number in this dossier. The two recorded deeds (reception #s 20210116996 and 20210116998) and the assessor’s ?prop=detail and ?prop=propinfo responses are the fixed points. The only number that depends on a non-deterministic methodology is the assessor’s time-adjusted resale value ($2,686,365) — their internal commercial-RE index.

Methodological note on the HoNS exclusion analysis

The argument in Chapter 11 that the House of Neighborly Service (HoNS) absence from the 599 W 71st RFA candidate pool is structurally explained by the Christopher M. Say overlap (HoNS Vice President + sitting Loveland Planning Commissioner April 2025 → April 2026 + Klein-RA’d 2025 Ward 3 candidate + Class 4 felony aggravated-animal-cruelty defendant by April 2026) is a parsimony argument, not a causal claim. The dossier does not assert that HoNS was deliberately excluded; the load-bearing verification target is the City Clerk’s December 2025 / January 2026 RFA solicitation distribution list (CORA #5, Chapter 09). Primary source for the Say profile is tier1/say_profile/FINDINGS.md.

OSINT collection methodology

This dossier was assembled using open-source intelligence techniques. The methodology is disclosed here so any reader can reproduce or independently verify any cited claim.

Direct retrieval of publicly-available primary records
Larimer County Recorder Landmark Web; Colorado Secretary of State BizSearch; Wisconsin Department of Financial Institutions Corporate Search; Internal Revenue Service Tax Exempt Organization Search; ProPublica Nonprofit Explorer; Colorado SOS TRACER campaign-finance database; Federal Election Commission disclosures; City of Loveland CivicWeb agenda portal; City of Loveland OpenGov transparency portal; Larimer County Assessor public API. Every retrieval is reproducible by any reader from a standard browser at the cited URL.
Web-scale archival
The Internet Archive Wayback Machine and archive.today were used to capture point-in-time snapshots of paywalled, ephemeral, or adversary-controlled URLs. Every URL footnote that has a Wayback snapshot at the time of capture carries the snapshot permalink alongside the original location; the local-file path is provided when a captured copy is preserved alongside the dossier.
Local content preservation
Where targets used commercial bot-management (e.g. the City of Loveland portal sits behind an Akamai bot-manager that blocks unsigned automated retrieval; the Bridge House withdrawal news release #8260 is the most prominent example) or had previously deleted public content (one Scottsdale Progress article was confirmed deleted between initial capture and publication), pages were rendered locally with a Chrome 131 user-agent and matching TLS-fingerprint profile via curl_cffi to obtain the content as it would render to a normal browser. Hash-preserved metadata (URL, retrieval timestamp, HTTP response headers, content SHA-256) is stored alongside the captured artifact at the local-file path cited in the footnote.
Egress
Initial primary-record retrieval used the public host’s default egress through a commercial VPN endpoint (IVPN, Denver exit). This is disclosed so any reader can reproduce the retrievals by either using the same path or by replaying the cited URLs from a standard browser. The captured content does not depend on the egress path; the egress disclosure exists to enable reader replay and to neutralise any subsequent characterisation of the collection as concealed.
What this methodology is not
No social engineering, no unauthorized access, no impersonation, no credential theft. Every cited source is a public record retrieved from its primary source, a quoted news article with attribution, a quoted dais statement with timecode, a Form 990 filing with EIN, a recorded instrument with reception number, or a derived figure with arithmetic shown. The CFAA compliance posture is at /about/#cfaa-compliance.
Reproducibility statement
The point of disclosing the collection stack is reader independence: every captured snapshot is reproducible by a reader using either standard browser retrieval at the cited URL, Wayback Machine retrieval at the cited snapshot URL, or local-file inspection at the cited path. The collection technique is a workaround for adversary-aware edge blocking on a subset of targets, not a fact-laundering layer.
License
This dossier is published under Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-4.0; reproductions should keep the URL footnotes intact.